By Diya Sompura | 22-23

Social loafing is a destructive behavior in which an individual puts in less effort than necessary
on a work task and hence passes it on to others in a team (Baron & Branscombe, 2006). This
has often come with a huge cost to companies where a recent study examined how social
loafing behavior can cost an organisation via high turnover intentions among employees. This
often serves as an impediment to team effectiveness where the group dynamics is chaotic and
people just want to “hide in the crowd”. Today, work teams have become an indispensable part
of working as many organisations run on the idea that “teamwork makes the dream work”.
However, managers often ignore the presence of certain shifting conditions that occur in the
group which makes it less productive. One of them can be termed a relationship or interpersonal
conflict. This is caused when members experience incompatibility towards their team often
leading to feelings of hostility, aggression, etc. towards each other (Simons & Peterson, 2000).
This type of conflict has often been linked to surfacing of negative emotions, unpleasant group
climate and withdrawal behavior among members. As people are social beings and interacting
in a social setting like a team, transmission of emotions as stated as emotional contagion is
evidenced to occur. This “catching” of emotions has been labeled as emotional contagion where
people tend to mimic other people’s moods consciously or unconsciously. However, this often
differs with people’s tendency of susceptibility with some ranking high or low in it. Another
factor involves how the tone of the group is influenced by a conflict situation and how this
might cause people to loaf further.
This study aimed to explore this interrelation between conflict, group affective tone and
emotional contagion and its association with social loafing. Limited studies have sought to
focus on individual-level distinctions such as susceptibility to EC dwelling into why certain
individuals tend to get tangled in it and why does tone of the group form a part in causing
members to loaf.
The methodology used in this study was quantitative where responses were collected from
employees who had worked or are currently working in a team. They also had to have faced
any disagreements during that period. These respondents were recruited from online platforms
such as Facebook and LinkedIn. 102 responses were collected and later analysed using a
software.
Interpretations of the findings
One of study’s main findings was to discover that conflict did have an impact on the tone or
climate of the group. The results also revealed that emotional contagion and conflict did
influence social loafing behavior. This meant that events being emotionally laden such as
conflicts tend to cause emotional reactions thus in turn impacting the climate of the group.
When members experience unpleasant emotions post-conflict each member through their
interactions with others might pass it on to others to the point where the group is converging to a particular emotion. In addition to this, the pathway of social loafing being influenced by
conflict was not surprising given conflicts are associated with avoidance behaviors in members.
Specifically, in some cases, it might also promote feelings of envy and has often been
considered detrimental due to its long-lasting effects such as a reduction in psychological
detachment impairing the recovery process, a negative mood at work, etc (Mier et al, 2013).
This type of stress often leads to reduced performance on the team due to increased arousal in
members and a narrowing of focus.
Emotions among this play a pivotal role in shaping behaviors of members. High-intensity
events like conflict tend to capture people’s attention quickly and people start to interpret it.
Individuals who are high in susceptibility to catching emotions might more likely pass it on to
others causing negative feelings to spiral within the group. They tend to share and express their
feelings to other group members which also make other people feel lazy and pass on work.
What can organisations do?
Conflict in today’s day is inevitable due to increasing workforce diversity in terms of culture,
sex, ethnicity, ideas, etc (Robbins & Judge, 2013). However, when managers or policymakers
can learn about factors associated with conflict then precautionary steps can be taken at the
outset rather than letting it go down a destructive path. Managers can conduct a session with
a group where each member first reflects on the ongoing group dynamics stating how they
feel about being part of it. Secondly, members interact and share their views leading to
‘advocacy’ and voicing out their perspectives. Lastly, when everyone has heard about
everyone’s opinions, members can be trained to ask open-ended questions to others regarding
their views to dwell deep into another’s perspective. It is also advisable that work coaches or
group coaching sessions where people can understand the origins of their emotions,
especially during relationship conflict where the focus is on targeting people. Training
sessions can be held where the expertise of enhancing one’s political skills can be learned.
Final thoughts
Today, different types of teams have emrged such as virtual teams, self-managd teams etc and
it becomes more than necessary to dwell into effective functioning of it.Thus. employing
various forms of team-building exercises promotes a positive tone in the group. This can help
foster prosocial behavior among team members where individuals feel less inclined to ‘hide in
the crowd’.
References
Social psychology (11th ed.). Boston:
Baron, R. A., Byrne, D., & Branscombe, N. R. (2006). Pearson
George, J. M. (n.d.-b). Personality, Affect, and Behavior in Groups.
Jehn, K. A. (1995). A Multimethod Examination of the Benefits and Detriments of Intragroup
Conflict. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40(2), 256. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393638
Yang, J., & Mossholder, K. W. (2004). Decoupling task and relationship conflict: The role of
intragroup emotional processing. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(5), 589–605.
https://doi.org/10.1002/job.258
Sanyal, S., & Hisam, M. W. (n.d.). The Impact of Teamwork on Work Performance of Employees:
A Study of Faculty Members in Dhofar University.
